Respon Amerika Serikat dalam Menyeimbangkan Kekuatan Cina Melalui AUKUS dalam Klaim Kedaulatan Cina di Laut Cina Selatan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29303/ijpss.v5i2.134Keywords:
AUKUS, United States, Australia, United KingdomAbstract
This research aims to analyze the formation of AUKUS as a new defense pact as the United States' response to China's unilateral claim of sovereignty in the South China Sea. The lack of presence of the United States, which for the last few decades has been too busy with its military operations in the Middle East region, has given China more freedom to carry out aggressive maneuvers in the Asia Pacific region which has then created an imbalance of power due to China's military strength being far superior to that of the alliance countries. United States in Asia such as the Philippines and Australia. In this research, a qualitative approach was used which aims to understand the phenomenon of events experienced by the subject through descriptions. Furthermore, this research uses the Balance of Power Theory and the Concept of Detterence as analytical tools to understand the material raised in this research. The results of this research show that AUKUS was formed due to the decline of the United States in various sectors which coincided with the rise of China as a new superpower. It is hoped that the selection of Australia and the UK in this collaboration will provide additional support to pressure China in the South China Sea through short-term and long-term programs.
References
Adrianus Lengu Wene. (2021). Determinasi Pakta AUKUS Terhadap Kemanan Kawasan Asia Tenggara. Jurnal Asia Pacific Studies, 5, 142–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33541/japs.v5i2.3990
Anadolu. (2023). Australia beli tiga kapal selam di bawah kemitraan AUKUS. Antara News. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3440310/australia-beli-tiga-kapal-selam-di-bawah-kemitraan-aukus
Aulia, J. D., & Sahide, A. (2022). Regional Stability Rivalry in the Indo Pacific Region: China’s Interests in Responding the AUKUS Trilateral Pact. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 9(9), 412–423.
Basu, P. (2021). Issue Brief. Observer Research Foundation. https://www.orfonline.org/research/in-deep-water-current-threats-to-the-marine-ecology-of-the-south-china-sea/
BBC News Indonesia. (2019). Huawei: Lima alasan mengapa Barat begitu khawatir dengan perusahaan teknologi China. BBC News Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/majalah-48336363
Christianson, J., Monaghan, S., & Cooke, D. (2023). AUKUS Pillar Two: Advancing the Capabilities of the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. CSIS. https://www.csis.org/analysis/aukus-pillar-two-advancing-capabilities-united-states-united-kingdom-and-australia
Durente, A. (2022). U.S.-China Trade War Hurt American Industries and Workers. Tax Foundation. https://taxfoundation.org/us-china-tariffs-trade-war/#:~:text=The trade war has not,damaged the economy even more.
Edel, C. (20203). The United States, Britain, and Australia Announce the Path Forward for AUKUS. CSIS. https://www.csis.org/analysis/united-states-britain-and-australia-announce-path-forward-aukus
Farley, R. (2021). Does China Qualify as Having a True Blue Water Navy? The National Interest. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/does-china-qualify-having-true-blue-water-navy-195958
Frankel, J., & Waltz, K. N. (1980). Theory of International Politics. International Journal, 35(3), 600. https://doi.org/10.2307/40201892
Huth, P. K. (1999). Deterrence and International Conflict: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Debates. ANNUAL REVIEWS, 2, 25–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.25
Kube, C. (2023). Taiwan: Explaining the U.S.-China dispute and why it matters. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/taiwan-us-china-dispute-why-it-matters-flashpoint-democracy-rcna78458
M, C. (2022). AUKUS: The Changing Dynamic and Its Regional Implications. European Journal of Development Studies, 2(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejdevelop.2022.2.1.63
McBride, J., Berman, N., & Chatzky, A. (2023). China’s Massive Belt and Road Initiative. COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-massive-belt-and-road-initiative
Mongilio, H. (2023). China Protests U.S. South China Sea Freedom of Navigation Operation. US NAVAL INSTITUTE. https://news.usni.org/2023/03/24/china-protests-u-s-south-china-sea-freedom-of-navigation-operation
Novita, A. A. D. (2022). AUKUS Alliance: United States Strategic Interest in Indo-Pacific. Jurnal Diplomasi Pertahanan, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.33172/jdp.v8i1.883
Nurmamuti, R. A., Faradilla, A. Y., Rismanto, A. I., Afifah, S. N., Hamida, A., & Sari, K. H. (2022). Analisis Kebijakan Luar Negeri Trump: Studi Kasus Perang Dagang Amerika Serikat-China. Jurnal Sosial Politik Intergratif, 2(1), 63. http://www.jisip.org/index.php/jsp/article/view/57/30
Peck, M. (2022). Vivid new photos give you a rare look at the South China Sea islands that a top US commander says China has fully militarized. Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/photos-show-details-of-chinese-south-china-sea-military-bases-2022-12
Puspaningrum, B. A. (2021). AS “Kalah” dalam Perang 20 Tahun di Afghanistan, Jendral Tertinggi Ungkap Alasannya. Kompas. https://www.kompas.com/global/read/2021/09/30/103822070/as-kalah-dalam-perang-20-tahun-di-afghanistan-jendral-tertinggi-ungkap
Sariguna, P. S. J. (2022). Analysis of the Indo-Pacific Outlook and Impact of the AUKUS Triatral Pact. Sarcouncil Journal of Economics and Business Management, 01(08), 1–12.
Sobarini, E., Rajab, D. D. A., & Waluyo, S. D. (2021). AUKUS Pact in the Perspective of Security Dilemma. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 04(12), 3981–3985. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i12-74
Sodhi, J. (2022). Island chain strategy: Steps to checkmate China. Financial Express. https://www.financialexpress.com/business/defence-island-chain-strategy-steps-to-checkmate-china-2565232/
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Peneltian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Alfabeta.
The White House. (2022). National Security Strategy. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf
The White House. (2023a). FACT SHEET: Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment at the G7 Summit. WH.GOV. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/05/20/fact-sheet-partnership-for-global-infrastructure-and-investment-at-the-g7-summit/
The White House. (2023b). FACT SHEET: Trilateral Australia-UK-US Partnership on Nuclear-Powered Submarines. WH.GOV. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/03/13/fact-sheet-trilateral-australia-uk-us-partnership-on-nuclear-powered-submarines/
Tom, L. (2023). Section 301 China Tariffs by End Use. American Action Forum. https://www.americanactionforum.org/research/section-301-china-tariffs-by-end-use/#:~:text=Section 301 Tariffs,-Throughout 2018%2C the&text=His administration found this authority,engage in unfair trade practices.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dimas Idham Santoso, Ahmad Mubarak Munir, Pamungkas Ayudhaning Dewanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
